Mixed micellar systems of SDS and Brij 35 or pentanesulfonic acid provide improved resolution through the alteration of the pseudostationary phase.
From: Encyclopedia of Separation Science, 2007
- Pacl*taxel
- Nanoparticle
- Doxorubicin
- Macrogol
- Drug Release
- Surfactant
- Copolymer
- Malignant Neoplasm
- Micelle
- Neoplasm
DISCOVER A DRUG SUBSTANCE, FORMULATE AND DEVELOP IT TO A PRODUCT
Bruno Galli, Bernard Faller, in The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry (Second Edition), 2003 At early stages stable solutions are preferred because of their defined physical state assumed as to be monomolecularly dispersed systems. Simple micellar dispersed solutions are also directly usable by the experimenter. Complex micellar systems like microemulsions or special solid systems (suspensions or solid dispersions) usually require a basic pharmaceutical development strategy and sufficient understanding of the technical concept to ensure appropriate quality and reproducibility of the formulation. These systems can usually be properly elaborated only at later development stages because of a lack of sufficient drug substance at early stages! In early preclinical drug testing, it is preferable to use excipients that can also be used in later development phases, including clinical development. Whenever possible, the same formulation principle should be used throughout preclinical testing. This applies to all studies in experimental animals including pharmacological, toxicological and pharmaco*kinetic studies. To switch without a rationale to different formulation principles may significantly affect the consistency of in vivo results such as, for example, bioavailability or in a worst case the pharmacodynamics. Not adhering to this simple rule has resulted many times in false interpretations of in vivo results and delays in compound development at later, more expensive stages (Fig. 40.2). With the complexity and the multitude of open biological and physicochemical questions at early stages, it becomes imperative to work closely and to interact using a multidisciplinary approach. Information from iterative learning loops for a formulation is on one hand derived from physical stress (time, temperature and humidity) and on the other hand information is provided sequentially from biological tests as pharmaco*kinetic results. Of particular interest is the wide range of dosing encountered: from the pharmacological doses up to toxicological doses. The main difficulties consist in properly assessing and distilling useful information out of these experiments as early as possible and integrating it into the dosage form concept. Boundless information flow is of particular importance as by tradition the different contributing units belong to different line functions and departments not always with the same objectives. The final result of these efforts is to have from the start a good estimate of dose (even if only in animals at this point), safety margin, route of administration and a consistent formulation approach for the subsequent expensive clinical trials (see point 1 in Fig. 40.4).D Which formulation principles are used?
Read full chapterView PDFExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780127444819500441
Multifunctional micellar nanomedicine for cancer therapy
Roohi Kesharwani, ... Malay K. Das, in Multifunctional Theranostic Nanomedicines in Cancer, 2021 Multifunctional micellar systems—novel tumor-targeted polymer micelles—are based on micelles having multiple functions. The engineering of micellar architecture with two or more different modifications enables them to simultaneously or sequentially perform a number of important functions within a single carrier, resulting in the multifunctional micelles. Polymeric micelles offer a unique platform that allows for incorporation of therapeutic, diagnostic, contrast/imaging agents, and targeting moieties. An ideal multifunctional micelle delivers drugs, remains in the bloodstream for a longer time, permits passive/receptor-mediated targeting, exhibits stimuli responsive drug release, and provides theragnostic monitoring abilities (Fig. 3.3). These modern techniques utilize the synergy of receptor-oriented endocytosis and hydrogen ion concentration sensitivity to achieve micelles that manifest with better cancer targeting and an increase in intracellular drug systemic availability. The modern multifunctional micelles, formed via the conjugation of targeted ligands on the micelle exterior or pulsate release technology, can minimize all disadvantages by improving the particles/drugs’ vulnerabilities to cancer [32,45]. Multifunctional micelles made up of PEO-b-PCL block copolymers were investigated with useful modifications on all the blocks [4]. They could codeliver siRNA and doxorubicin via passive/receptor-mediated targeting to the cellular component and give a pH-sensitive drug release in the endosomes. The PCL core contains short polyamines (spermine) to conjugate MDR1 siRNA, and conjugates doxorubicin through a pH-sensitive hydrazone bond. Fluorescent imaging probes were conjugated to trace the micelles in vitro and in vivo. An active targeting moiety, RGD4C unique for integrin (αvβ3) receptors, and a cell-penetrating TAT-peptide encouraged passive targeting [17]. Bay and coworkers investigated the application of multifunctional polymer micelles composed of PEG-p(Asp-Hyd-ADR). These micelles showed folate receptor-mediated targeted delivery and pH-responsive doxorubicin release. This multifunctional platform was found to be efficient (approximately 10-fold post 24hours exposure) for the treatment of KB cells [46]. Nasongkla et al. reported multifunctional cRGD-DOXSPIO micelles. They showed effective tumor targeting ability and theranostic efficacy [47]. A recent study reported multifunctional pluronic P123/F127 mixed micelles in a photodynamic therapy against PC3 and MCF-7 cancer cells [48]. Different factors contribute to multifunctional nanodrug delivery utilization flexibility, e.g., the location of cancer cell in the body, incapability of the drug to reach the cancer cells, and the greater risk of toxic healthy cells. Nanodrug delivery can alter the pharmaco*kinetic/pharmacodynamics profile of a drug, resulting in adequate therapeutic effects with less or no toxicity. This leads to the production of a “multifunctional” nano-based drug delivery system. For this reason, targeting and image contrast enhancements are attached to the nanoformulation [49] Table 3.1. Table 3.1. Some examples of marketed multifunctional drug-loaded micelles.3.4 The multifunctional design of the micelle nanomedicine platform for cancer
S. no. Product name Drug Application Status Reference 1. Genexol-PM Pacl*taxel Ovary, breast, lung cancer Approved [50] 2. Lipotecan (TLC388) (Taiwan liposome) TLC388 (Camptothecin derivate) Renal and liver cancer Phase 1/2 [51] 3. Nanoxel Pacl*taxel Advanced breast cancer Phase 1 [52] 4. NC-6004 (Nanoplatin) (NanoCarrier) Cisplatin Pancreatic cancer Phase 2/3 [53] 5. NC-6300 (K-912) (NanoCarrier) (Japan) Epirubicin Solid tumors Phase 1 [54] 6. Paclical Pacl*taxel Ovarian cancer Phase 3 [55] 7. SP1049C Doxorubicin Advanced adenocarcinoma Phase 2/3 [56] 8. – Sorafenib SPIONs for MRI – [57] 9. – DOX SPION for MRI – [56]
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780128217122000189
Stimuli-responsive micelles
Hema A. Nair, ... Mangal S. Nagarsenker, in Drug Targeting and Stimuli Sensitive Drug Delivery Systems, 2018 The concept of using pH as a means of cellular delivery possibly originates from the observation that certain enveloped viruses developed strategies to make use of the acidification of the endosomal lumen to infect the host cells (Miyauchi et al., 2011). Although the human body maintains a steady pH of 7.4 in case of most fluid compartments, nevertheless, both at the macro (e.g., various segments of the gastrointestinal tract) and at the micro levels (e.g. lysosome), variations do exist. Several pathological conditions also contribute to this natural variation in pH. For example, the intra-tumoral environment has a more acidic pH because of the lactic acid production, owing to the under-perfused and hypoxic environment within the tumor. Similarly, pH within inflamed tissue is also found to be lowered, as in the case of joints affected by rheumatoid arthritis (Farr et al., 1985). Nanocarriers also encounter a cascade of declining pH values along their journey from tissue interstitium to cytoplasm (early endosome > late endosome > lysosome). In the case of the above situations, a pH or proton concentration-triggered drug release can serve as an effective way of enabling higher drug accumulation at the disease site. pH-responsive micellar systems therefore incorporate a design wherein the system is stable at physiological pH, but responds to a mild change, usually a decrease in pH. In the case of tumor targeting, following an increased accumulation of the micellar nanovehicle in the tumor attributed to the EPR effect, the release of drug is now triggered due to lowering of pH in the tissue interstitium, or within a cytoplasmic compartment such as the lysosome, depending on the pH at which the micelle forming polymer responds. The drug release may be elicited in either of two ways: Release of drug by cleavage of an acid labile bond used to covalently anchor it to the micelles forming amphiphilic block copolymer; Destabilization of micellar structure, which, in turn, may be due to the change in hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance, shape or size of the micelles. A plethora of pH-sensitive materials have been synthesized and evaluated for pH-triggered drug release (Yang et al., 2016, Jones et al., 2003, Yang et al., 2010b). The strategies used in designing pH-responsive polymeric micelles can mainly be grouped into two, based on the approaches described above: A prodrug like approach, wherein the micelle forming polymers are pH-insensitive, but the drug is covalently linked to the hydrophobic block of the micelle forming amphiphile through linkages that degrade in acidic environment. Examples of such acid labile linkers include hydrazone, acetal, benzoic imine, and ortho-ester. The acid labile linkers may be inserted onto the main polymer chain, side chains, or at the end of the core-forming block. Such a strategy is exemplified by micelles composed of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(aspartate), where adriamycin was conjugated with hydrophobic poly(aspartate) segment of the amphiphile through acid labile hydrazone bonds (Bae et al., 2005). Micelles obtained with this polymer, were found to hold the drug under physiological conditions (pH 7.4) and release occurred in the acidic microenvironment of endosomes and lysosomes. In vitro evaluation in murine colon adenocarcinoma 26 (C26) cells and human small cell lung cancer cell line, SBC-3, revealed intracellular pH-triggered drug release capability and tumor-infiltrating permeability of the micelles. More significantly, in vivo biodistribution studies revealed the long circulating nature of the micelles, resulting in greater accumulation at the tumor site, whereas in the case of other organs including heart and kidneys, the micelles failed to undergo retention and were evacuated out, with the drug payload safely bound within (Bae et al., 2005). Change in pH as a means of destabilizing micellar structure leading to drug release has also been actively explored. The design of micelles is based on the inclusion of titrable groups, such tertiary amino or carboxylic acid, which results in gain or loss of charge, depending on the pH of surrounding medium. Typically, an hydrophobic segment of the amphiphile contains ionizable groups, the ionization of which results in a change in the hydrophobic/lipophilic balance of the amphiphile, which in turn results in breakdown of the micellar assembly, often through hydration and dissolution of the amphiphile. Depending on ionizable groups employed to impart pH-responsiveness, amphiphilic polymers of this category may be either anionic or cationic. Polymers bearing pendant acidic functional groups protonate at low pH, yielding neutral molecules that are relatively hydrophobic. At neutral or high pH, the molecules can release protons and become hydrophilic. Such polymers include polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, polyglutamic acid, and those containing polysulfonamide groups. For drug targeting, with due regard to the pathological conditions existing within the tumor microenvironment, the more useful pH-sensitive polymers are those bearing cationic groups, since these would tend to become protonated to the charged species at lower pH. Examples of such polymers include poly(N,N′-dimethyl aminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA), poly(4-vinylpyridine), poly(histidine), and poly(β-amino ester) (PAE), of which the latter two are of major interest owing to their biocompatibility. pH-sensitive PEG–PAE-based amphiphiles can be synthesized via a Michael addition reaction between monoacrylated PEG, 1,6-hexane diol diacrylate, and 4,4′-trimethylene dipiperidine (Gao et al., 2010a). Micelles based on these amphiphiles have been investigated for diversified applications, including delivery of doxorubicin to cancerous tissue (Wu et al., 2010), imaging agents like ferric oxide for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of acidic ischemic regions in the brain (Gao et al., 2011), tetramethyl rhodamine for imparting discernible fluorescence to the tumor site (Min et al., 2010), and photosensitive agents such as the hydrophobic protoporphyrin (PpIX) for tumor-targeted theranostic applications (Koo et al., 2010). Similarly, micelles based on amphiphilic polymer composed of pH-sensitive poly(histidine) as hydrophobic block and PEG as hydrophilic block have been probed for targeted delivery. Copolymerization of histidine (His) with another amino acid l-phenylalanine (Phe) is reported to reduce the pKa of resulting PEG-b-PHis/Phe based micelles (Kim et al., 2005). Triblock copolymer composed of poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA)-b-PEG-b-pHis is reported to form micelles at physiological pH; however in acidic pH (6.6), the micelles swell to release the loaded doxorubicin (Liu et al., 2011). The addition of a hydrophobic PLLA segment stabilizes the micellar state (Lee et al., 2007). pH sensitivity can also be imparted by tethering appropriate pendant groups to the amphiphile backbone. Micelles were designed using di-block copolymer of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(γ-benzyl l-glutamate), with N,N-diisopropyl ethylenediamine (DIP) conjugated to poly(l-glutamic acid) (PGA) blocks as side groups. N,N-diisopropyl ethylenediamine enhances the pH-sensitivity of poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly[N-(N′,N′-diisopropylaminoethyl) glutamide]. This PEG-PGA(DIP) polymer can self-assemble into micelles with an acid-responsive PGA-DIP core and hydrophilic PEG corona. The authors have reported faster acid response with increased grafting percentage of DIP. In acidic condition, the hydrophobic block PGA (DIP) transforms to a hydrophilic block, leading to a gradual expansion and disassembly of micellar structure, resulting in the release of entrapped doxorubicin (Li et al., 2016). Finally, pH-selective disassembly of micelles can be tailored by preparation of mixed micelles, composed of combinations of amphiphiles. This approach is exemplified by mixed micelles composed of di-block copolymer of cationic poly(5-propyl-1,3-dioxan-2-one)-b-dimethylamine modified polycarbonate (PC(MPpC-MMA)) and anionic poly(ethylene glycol)-b-carboxylated polycarbonate (PEG-PCCOOH). The oppositely charged copolymers self-assembled into mixed micelles at physiological pH (7.4). The micelle formation is driven by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. The hydrophobic core was formed by cationic polycarbonate, whereas PEGylated polycarbonate forms the hydrophilic corona of micelles. The dimethylamine moiety is responsible for imparting pH-responsiveness and disassembly of micellar aggregates occurs at pH below 5 (Yu et al., 2016b). Various types of pH-responsive block copolymers, along with the pH-sensitive linkages employed in drug delivery applications are summarized in Table 8.1. Table 8.1. pH-Sensitive Micelles and Their Applications in Drug Delivery The complexity of the disease condition prompts the need for more effective control on drug release to enhance therapeutic outcome. Therefore, besides the pH-based systems discussed, literature also abounds in studies where dual, or sometimes multiple, approaches are simultaneously explored to achieve greater drug targeting potential of the developed system(s); pH change is also sometimes an arm of this multi-pronged approach. Tian K et al. developed a multi-responsive (pH-sensitive, reduction-sensitive and folic acid-mediated targeting) micelles for targeted delivery of anticancer drug doxorubicin. Here, a double end functionalized PEG with folic acid as one end group served as the hydrophilic part to which a hydrophobic block of t-butyl acrylate was added via atom transfer radical polymerization. A definite proportion of N, N’-bis (acryloyl) cystamine was incorporated in the hydrophobic block to enable the core to undergo disulfide-mediated crosslinking and consequent stabilization. The core cross-linked micelles were finally subjected to hydrolysis for removal of t-butyl group leaving the acrylic acid groups, which further conferred pH sensitivity in the core. The micelles loaded with doxorubicin exhibited only 13.4% premature drug release in 36 hours, while release in media stimulating a tumor microenvironment: acidic and high Glutathione (GSH) level; was observed to be 78.7% (Tian et al., 2016a). In vitro studies in ovarian carcinoma cell line SKOV3 demonstrated the ability of the micelles to accumulate doxorubicin into the cell nuclei. Mixed micelles, composed of (PEG-poly(d,l-lactic acid) block copolymer) bearing a tumor-targeting peptide as one component and the other comprising of pH-sensitive methyl ether poly(ethylene glycol) (MPEG)-poly(beta-amino ester) (PAE) block copolymer (MPEG-PAE) have been prepared. Both tetramethylrhodamine (TRITC) as fluorescent marker and doxorubicin as chemotherapeutic agent were separately entrapped in the micelles. In vivo studies in tumor-bearing mice demonstrated excellent anticancer efficacy, compared to free doxorubicin and doxorubicin-encapsulated MPEG-PAE micelles (without targeting ligand) which provides further justification for the use of multiple strategies in achieving selective tumor targeting (Wu et al., 2010). Besides the approaches outlined above, change in pH as a trigger to bring about other changes in the micelle properties have also been explored. e.g., for removal of the PEG segment from the micelles. PEGylation offers advantages of longer systemic circulation (avoid RES uptake) and selective accumulation at tumor site by EPR effect. However, its utility is rendered limited by recent reports that PEGylation inhibits cellular internalization and subsequent endosomal escape (Hatakeyama et al., 2013). Therefore, attempts are in progress to design “sheddable” micelles by conjugating PEG in the polymer through a pH-sensitive linker. Zhao and coworkers conjugated phosphatidylethanolamine with PEG using benzoic imine. The PEG chains offer the steric hindrance and protect micelles at physiological pH, whereas disassembly of the PEG chain occurs in an acidic microenvironment of lysosomes after intracellular uptake. Although complete removal of PEG was not observed in extracellular pH, in vitro cell uptake was significantly higher when incubated at pH 6.8, compared to pH 7.4 (Zhao et al., 2016).8.6.1 pH-Responsive Micelles
Sr. No. Amphiphilic Copolymer pH-Sensitive Linker Therapeutic Agents Results Ref 1. PLGA-PEG-PLGA N-Boc-histidine Doxorubicin Higher in vitro drug release in acidic pH 6.2 in comparison to pH 7.4, higher uptake of drug into MDA-MB-435 cells. Chang et al. (2010) 2. Poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether-b-(poly lactic acid)-co-poly(β-amino esters) Poly(β-amino esters) Doxorubicin In vitro drug release from the micelles at acidic pH. Zhang et al. (2012) The micelles exhibited higher cytotoxicity towards HepG2 cells 3. Mixed micelles composed of poly(HEMA-co-histidine)-b-PLA and di-block copolymer of PEG–PLA containing folate for active cancer targeting Core composed of HEMA-co-histidine Doxorubicin Acidic pH-mediated destabilization of the core resulted in significant drug release. Higher folate-mediated cellular uptake in HeLa cells. Tsai et al. (2010) In vivo tumor targeting. 4. Mixed micelles of AP-peptide bearing PEG-poly(d,l-lactic acid) and methyl ether poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(β-amino ester) poly(β-amino ester) Doxorubicin pH-dependent micellization/de-micellization transition at the tumoral acidic pH. pH-dependent drug release profile. Wu et al. (2010) Tumor targeting of doxorubicin 5. Poly(polylactide-co-methacrylic acid)-b-poly(acrylic acid) Methacrylic acid/acrylic acid Nifedipine Rapid drug release in simulated intestinal fluid (pH 7.36). Enable oral delivery of hydrophobic drug with specifically releasing the drug in intestine. Yang et al. (2016) 6. Derivatized chitosan such as N-octyl-N-O-succinyl chitosan Succinic acid Meloxicam Higher release of meloxicam at intestinal pH 6.8 in comparison to acidic pH 0–2. Woraphatphadung et al. (2016) 7. Hydrazide-modified poly(oligo ethylglycol methyl ether methacrylate)-b-poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) Hydrazine Cisplatin 10 times faster degradation of hydrazone bond at pH 5.5 than at pH 7.4. Higher cytotoxicity of drug loaded micelles. Binauld et al. (2012)
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780128136898000082
Polymeric micelles: a ray of hope among new drug delivery systems
Anuja Kapse, ... Rakesh K. Tekade, in Drug Delivery Systems, 2020 Micelle stability is indicated by thermodynamic and kinetic stability. The micellar system can be considered thermodynamically stable if the amount of polymer in the aqueous solution is above the CMC. As the micelle is administered i.v., the system undergoes extreme dilution; hence, it is necessary to know the CMC of the system. It is necessary that the system remains in the micellar form in the systemic circulation until it reaches the targeted site. Kinetic stability is determined by the exchange rate of the polymer chain between the micelle and the bulk. Kinetic stability is important to predict the release of the physical entrapped drug from the polymeric micelle. Block copolymers are found to produce a micellar system which is kinetically stable because of the presence of more number of the hydrophobic site available for interaction. Lack of kinetic stability may lead to leakage of the drug from the micellar system in the systemic circulation before reaching the target site. Hence to enhance both the thermodynamic and kinetic stability, several strategies have been employed, such as strategies to reduce the CMC, cross-linking in the core, and formation of heterocomplex micelles. Aromatic groups have been found to decrease the CMC and also help to strengthen the interactions leading to increased stability of the micelle (Kulthe et al., 2012).6.8.8 Stability of polymeric micelle
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780128144879000065
SHEEP | Milk
M. Juarez, M. Ramos, in Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition (Second Edition), 2003 The renneting properties of sheeps' milk are affected by a number of factors such as pH, physicochemical composition, micellar system, salts equilibrium, calcium concentration, and the temperature and time of heating. Sheeps' milk coagulates well and is indeed very suitable for making high-quality cheeses. It coagulates faster than cows' milk, and less rennet is needed to coagulate it in the same time as cows' milk. Curd formation is also faster than in cows' milk, but syneresis takes longer. The reason for this difference may be that sheeps' milk contains more casein, ionic calcium, and colloidal calcium than cows' milk. The renneting time and rate of firming are practically unaffected by the addition of calcium.Renneting Properties
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B012227055X010749
Milk | Sheep Milk
M. Ramos, M. Juarez, in Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences (Second Edition), 2011 The renneting properties of sheep’s milk are affected by a number of factors such as pH, physicochemical composition, micellar system, salts equilibria, calcium concentration, temperature and time of heating. Sheep’s milk coagulates well and is indeed very suitable for making high-quality cheeses. Coagulation is faster than in cow’s milk, and less rennet is needed to coagulate in the same time as for cow’s milk. Curd formation is also faster than in cow’s milk, but syneresis takes longer. The reason for this difference may be that sheep’s milk contains more casein, ionic calcium, and colloidal calcium than those contained in cow’s milk. Renneting time and rate of firming are practically unaffected by the addition of calcium. The coagulation properties of sheep’s milk are less affected than those of cow’s milk by storage at 4°C or by heat treatment. In fact, although severe treatments (90°C, 10min) delay coagulation of sheep’s milk, gelation does take place. In cow’s milk, on the other hand, heating for 1min at 90°C prevents gelation. The reason for this difference in the behavior of cow’s and sheep’s milks could be that in the latter, when heated to 85 or 90°C, the micelles grow considerably in size, attaining 1.75 times the size of the micelles in fresh milk.Renneting Properties
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780123744074003149
Enzymology at the Membrane Interface: Intramembrane Proteases
R.P. Baker, S. Urban, in Methods in Enzymology, 2017 Conducting kinetic analysis of intramembrane protease catalysis in detergent systems instead of in membranes affords the major advantage of applying standard techniques to these unusual enzymes. However, micellar systems like detergents introduce several unappreciated hydrodynamic features that are not true characteristics of the enzymes, and intramembrane proteases themselves have been found to display different properties in membranes. Given the importance of these considerations, we will detail each specifically in turn (and summarized in Table 1). Table 1. Limitations of Detergent Micelle Systems for Kinetic Analysis Kinetic rate measurements performed in detergent micelle systems are confounded by several inherent limitations. First, reactions in detergents occur as a result of micelle–micelle fission/fusion events; since substrates and enzymes are contained within separate detergent micelles, catalysis relies on the rate of exchange between different micelles (Barzykin & Tachiya, 1994) and therefore may not accurately reflect the enzyme's rate in natural membranes. Second, the true transmembrane substrate concentration in a detergent system is the concentration of protein relative to micelles, not the protein relative to buffer solution. As such, the measured KM for the same protein concentration of substrate/enzyme changes depending on the amount and/or type of detergent used in the reaction. For example, a Michaelis–Menten kinetic analysis, performed in the presence of identical protein concentrations and buffer constituents, but 0.1% vs 0.3% n-dodecyl-β-d-maltoside (DDM) detergent (not an uncommon difference between labs), results in a twofold change in KM when measured exactly in parallel (Fig. 2). Changing the type of detergent is likely to have an even greater impact. Third, detergents by their nature are inherently cooperative systems, and thus observing cooperativity in a kinetic experiment conducted in detergent should be expected and not ascribed to the enzyme without further evidence. In fact, the degree of cooperativity changes depending on detergent concentration when all other parameters are held constant (Fig. 2). Fourth, steady-state enzyme kinetics relies on achieving a plateau of enzyme velocity with increasing substrate as evidence of enzyme saturation. However, substrate solubility limits are often reached before saturation of enzyme with substrate can be achieved. In fact, often the reaction rate plateaus that are observed (and erroneously interpreted as enzyme saturation) result from substrate aggregation or altered detergent/protein complexes as the ratio of protein to micelle is changed (because detergent concentration is usually held constant, increasing the amount of protein alters the number of substrates in each micelle). As such, perceived KM constants in detergent systems appear much lower (tighter) than the true binding constant for a substrate (Dickey, Baker, Cho, & Urban, 2013). In addition to the inherent properties that surfactants impose, intramembrane proteases behave differently in detergent vs membrane systems: GlpG, for example, generates incorrect cleavage sites in substrates, has a 10-fold higher turnover constant (kcat), and even cleaves some nonsubstrates in detergent systems (Dickey et al., 2013; Moin & Urban, 2012). This is because the membrane environment plays an active role in “tempering” enzyme and substrate dynamics, while both are radically changed in detergent systems (Moin & Urban, 2012). Inhibitor accessibility to the active site is also altered in detergent vs membrane systems. For example, the small-molecule inhibitor JLK6 (7-amino-4-chloro-3-methoxy-isocoumarin) has a >10-fold more potent EC50 in detergent vs membrane with exactly the same substrate/enzyme (Fig. 6A). Finally, most medically relevant rhomboid proteases are inactive in detergent systems; the only eukaryotic rhomboid protease that has been characterized biochemically, Drosophila melanogaster Rhomboid-4 (Baker & Urban, 2015), absolutely requires reconstitution for activity. Ascribing enzymatic properties to rhomboid proteases as a family based on analysis of a minority that remains active in detergents introduces a serious sampling bias.2 Enzymatic Considerations for Kinetic Analysis of Proteolysis in Detergent Micelle Systems
Detergent Micelle System Properties Implications for Kinetic Analysis Sequestration: enzyme and substrate are in separate detergent micelles Micellar fusion/fission rates introduce additional and unaccounted kinetic step Micelle dilution effect: concentration of micelles is the effective “volume” of the reaction Kinetic parameters scale with both type and concentration of detergent, not just concentration of proteins Cooperativity: detergents self-associate in a strongly cooperative manner Danger of misappropriating cooperativity to enzyme:substrate interaction Solubility: limit of solubility imposed by maximal protein:detergent ratios Substrate solubility limit and/or distorted micelle structure may plateau reaction rates before enzyme is truly saturated Altered dynamics: increased protein dynamics in detergent Cleavage at ectopic sites in substrates or even nonsubstrates Accessibility: altered accessibility of inhibitors to enzyme active site Overestimation of inhibitor efficacies Altered conformation: nonnative environment changes enzyme conformation/function Catalysis may be enhanced, diminished, or even disallowed Enzyme bias: only some intramembrane proteases are active in detergent (many require a membrane environment) Kinetic properties of the subset of enzymes active in detergent may not be generally applicable to entire class of proteases
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/S0076687916303913
Amphiphilic block copolymers–based micelles for drug delivery
Muhammad Imran, ... Shafiullah, in Design and Development of New Nanocarriers, 2018 Thermo-sensitive polymeric micelles are prepared in order to achieve temporal drug delivery control through variations in the temperature of the environment slightly below or above the lower critical solution temperature. This leads to the micellar system destabilization and triggers a burst-like release of the loaded drugs. Hyperthermia is used for this purpose in the case of targeted drug delivery to tumors. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) is the most widely used thermo-sensitive polymer. It exhibits lower critical solution temperature at 33°C in aqueous solution, below which it is water soluble. Changes in temperature occur either due to internal triggers like hyperthermia in inflammation, or can be applied externally. When ultrasound or high frequency is applied locally, the generation of heat takes place and results in the oscillation of target-accumulated magneto-sensitive micelles. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylamide)-b-poly(d,l-lactide) copolymer micelles have been used for tumor targeting of the drug docetaxel (Mourya et al., 2011). It was found that hyperthermia increased the targeting efficiency of drug-loaded micelles with their reduced toxicity.10.6.4.2.7.2 Thermo-sensitive micelles
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780128136270000107
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery
Ameya Deshpande, ... Jerry Nesamony, in Emerging Nanotechnologies for Diagnostics, Drug Delivery and Medical Devices, 2017 Membranes in liposomes are primarily constituted of phospholipids, and these phospholipids consist of ester bonds, which are sensitive to hydrolysis [122]. The organization of the lipid assembly can change from lamellar to a micellar system because of the chemical hydrolysis of the liposomal phospholipids [123]. Lysophosphatidylcholine and fatty acids are formed [124] and membrane permeability is increased [125] when these transformations occur. The peroxidation of unsaturated acyl chains is generally accompanied by phospholipid degradation [125]. The permeability of the bilayer was increased by the lipid peroxidation. The degradation process resulted in a number of products with highly different chemical natures [122,125]. As a result of these degradation processes, phospholipid use in such formulations is very limited and is currently substituted with nonionic surfactants to circumvent degradation problems [125].8.7.1 Phospholipid Stability
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780323429788000127
Bilosomes: a novel platform for drug delivery
Dipak Kumar Gupta, ... Abdullah M. Al-Mohizea, in Systems of Nanovesicular Drug Delivery, 2022 When combined with polar lipids, traditional surfactants, or amphiphilic medicines, bile acids can form mixed micelles with lower critical micelle concentrations and greater solubility than the individual entities. There is also the option of making mixed micellar systems without the use of nonpolar solvents that are often used in pharmaceutical formulations to improve or increase the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs.34,35 A phospholipid like lecithin can also buffer bile salt detergent characteristics and reduce their cytotoxic properties by forming mixed micelles. a phospholipid like lecithin can also neutralize bile salt detergent qualities and minimize potentially harmful effects by generating mixed micelles. Combination micelles of glycocholic acid and soy lecithin are utilized as a solubilization agent for diazepam, a hydrophobic benzodiazepine.36 Amphotericin B is available as a micellar suspension with sodium deoxycholate for parenteral administration.3718.2.3.2 Bile salt-phospholipid mixed micelles
View chapterExplore book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://sciencedirect.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/science/article/pii/B9780323918640000048